Category Archives: banks

Auto Added by WPeMatico

India Worried Crypto Could Destabilize Rupee

Crypto Could Destabilize Rupee, Says Indian Gov’t Committee

A report by Quartz India suggests that the Indian government is concerned about the effect cryptocurrency may have on its national currency.

According to the article, a high-level panel working on a cryptocurrency regulatory framework has observed that a less-explored area for crypto use does exist and possesses as much risk as with the already established concerns of money laundering and terror financing.

The committee, led by the economic affairs secretary in the ministry of finance Subhas Chandra Garg, has expressed concerns about the impact of cryptocurrency on Indian rupee in the long term should it become a recognized medium of exchange.

“If Bitcoin and other digital currencies are going to be allowed to be used for payments then whether it will end up destabilizing the fiat currency is a major concern for them [the Garg panel],” the post reads, citing an anonymous crypto enthusiast who met with the ministers.

The article has cited another report compiled by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) — of which the Indian central bank is a member — as being the basis for the fears which are further amplified by the uncertainties cryptocurrency may have on the financial ecosystem as a whole as current frameworks are void of an encompassing metric system to account for such scaling effects. More so, the BIS may also be worried that central bank issued digital currencies may also contribute to the instability of the financial system as well.

Perhaps these may be legitimate concerns, as cryptocurrency has so far demonstrated scaling features that could put legacy systems out of commission, and hence affect traditional banks that are unwilling to upgrade. Some forward-thinking financial institutions have begun exploring how to use the blockchain for interbank relations and are considering a digital currency to that effect.

While the banks involved in the transition to blockchain-based systems have stated that the digital currency will be for cross-border payments and would only involve bank-to-bank transactions, the BIS had warned last year that digital coins might destabilize traditional lenders if offered widely to the general public.

The legality of cryptocurrency in India remains flimsy since the committee involved with drafting a regulatory framework have given mixed signals on their stance with digital currencies. At one time, they recommended a ban on cryptocurrency, and later on, warmed up to the idea that “cryptocurrency cannot be dismissed as completely illegal”. With plans to develop its own state-backed cryptocurrency currently on hold, the threats may have indeed been real to the nation.

Rahul Raj, founder of Koinex, has opined that such worries are premature, as nothing of the sort could happen in the near term given that cryptocurrencies are only being used in a very small circle for purchases. But it was further suggested that the concerns can only become of effect if blockchain has scaled to the level of Mastercard and Visa.

Bitcoin News published early today a report on a sample poll survey revealing that in the US, only 3% of people used Bitcoin to make purchases in the past month. This goes further to prove Raj’s point and while the hype about cryptocurrencies is mainly bolstered by the speculative value, the utility aspect of most blockchain products are still a while off from full-scale adoption.


Follow on Twitter: @BitcoinNewsCom

Telegram Alerts from

Want to advertise or get published on – View our Media Kit PDF here.

Image Courtesy: Pixabay

The post India Worried Crypto Could Destabilize Rupee appeared first on

CBDC Study: Mixed Sentiments but Positive Outlook from 21 Central Banks

Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are currently being trialed and researched by a number of major central banks around the world.

Statistical findings

Released on 25 October 2018, the collaborative study between IBM Blockchain World Wire and the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF) has found that 38% of the 21 central banks studied and trialed CBDCs to “inform the next upgrades” of their real-time gross settlement (RTGS) systems.

The remaining 62% were not active in this field, though the study does reveal a growing sentiment toward distributed ledger technology (DLT) in fintech, as well as smart contracts.

According to the report, central bank experiments with CBDC DLT systems resulted in “mixed results”, which it boils down to the mixed objectives set out by researchers, seemingly these goals are outlined by “novel avenues” being explored as opposed to the creation of an entire RTGS system replacement.

A majority of the respondents (76%) were unsure as to whether or not DLT is the solution, questioning its ability to live up to the hype with regulation being a contentious area. That said, the report notes that the central banks themselves are not putting sufficient effort into to researching the regulation of DLT payments and how they would work.

Of all the legal frameworks available that wholesale CBDCs would have to abide by, the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMIs) are most relevant, which are the international standards for “payment, clearing and settlement systems”, as defined by the Bank for International Settlements.

Expert views

Lael Brainard, Federal Reserve Board of Governors offers a quote to the report saying: “Digital tokens for wholesale payments and some aspects of distributed ledger technology – the key technologies underlying cryptocurrencies – may hold promise for strengthening traditional financial instruments and markets.”

The report concludes that cross-border collaboration is essential to overcoming the complexities that come with RTGS in domestic and cross-border payments.

Michelle Bullock, Assistant Governor (Financial System) of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), writes that “cross-border payments are widely regarded as an area in which significant efficiency gains exist. Current processes are slow and costly, involving significant compliance burden and a number of different financial institutions in different jurisdictions.”

Offering somewhat of a solution, she adds, “New technologies and new business models could be used to address some of these frictions.”


Aside the statistical results and opinions, the report also breaks down particular areas of the subject across five sections, also offering some suggestions for those seeking to create CBDCs and how to manage particular issues that may arise.

It also makes note of several countries that are actively exploring DLT solutions and engaging with the potential issuance of a national CBDC, such as the Bank of Thailand who is developing a wholesale CBDC and has successfully tested its key payment capabilities, and the Bank of Canada who have tested DLT in payment systems to mixed results.

Furthermore, the need for a cooperative international regulation effort is considered as “critical” by the study, writing that PFMIs offer a “solid foundation”, but are limited as a long-term solution due to the potential of “regulatory arbitrage in different jurisdictions”.


Follow on Twitter: @bitcoinnewscom

Telegram Alerts from

Want to advertise or get published on – View our Media Kit PDF here.

Image Courtesy: Pixabay

The post CBDC Study: Mixed Sentiments but Positive Outlook from 21 Central Banks appeared first on

Bitfinex Launches Distributed Banking Solution for Fiat Deposits

Bitfinex, the largest USD to Bitcoin exchange in the world, has been making headlines recently with their banking troubles. Fiat deposits on Bitfinex were officially halted for about a week, while simultaneously the Bitfinex subreddit is filled with complaints that fiat withdrawals are not functioning correctly, even though Bitfinex says fiat withdrawals never stopped working. Bitfinex launched a new distributed banking solution on 16 October 2018 and has restarted fiat deposits for USD, GBP, JPY, and EUR.

With the new system, users initiate a request to deposit fiat, specifying the exact amount of fiat they wish to deposit. The user’s account is then reviewed, and then they receive a deposit notification telling them where to deposit the fiat. The user then deposits the fiat, which is processed in 6-10 days. The minimum deposit is USD 10,000, and there is a deposit fee of 0.1%.

This distributed banking solution for fiat deposits sounds similar to the method used by Bitcoin dealers on LocalBitcoins for many years. Large Bitcoin dealers generally have accounts with multiple banks, often under many different names, and they tell their clients where to deposit fiat on a case by case basis. This sort of system is done to distribute deposits between banks so that the load on each bank account is minimized. If a Bitcoin dealer uses the same bank account for every deposit they usually have their accounts shut down since a huge volume of deposits from many different people is suspicious to the bank.

Bitfinex is the largest USD exchange in the world, so even if they distribute fiat deposits between numerous different banks, the volumes in each bank will likely be high enough to raise suspicions. This system might work for a temporary period at each bank, but there is a large risk of Bitfinex’s bank accounts getting closed sporadically. It seems Bitfinex is removing risk for themselves by putting a 6-10 day wait period to approve a fiat deposit, but that certainly does not remove the risk for their customers who could end up getting deposits stuck in limbo if the bank they deposit to freezes the bank account.

Bitfinex seems to welcome the challenges that will come from dealing with banks like this, saying “We believe this system to be significantly more durable in the face of sustained attacks by our competition and their supporters. Ongoing campaigns against us will only result in our company becoming stronger and better”. This is the same sort of attitude that Bitcoin dealers have when dealing with banks. Generally, as Bitcoin dealers lose bank accounts, they simply add more bank accounts under different names, generating a prolific underground network to send and receive fiat. It seems Bitfinex is on track to doing something like that.

This distributed banking solution launched by Bitfinex is certainly not ideal. It is better for a crypto exchange to have a solid banking relationship with a single bank, rather than trying to circumvent the system with many banks. Coinbase processes fiat deposits and withdrawals relatively quickly when compared to Bitfinex since it is compliant and follows all regulations. This makes the customer experience much less stressful and more efficient on Coinbase versus Bitfinex. Generally, the longest a fiat deposit or withdrawal should take is 3-5 days with ACH, and Bitfinex’s deposit system is much slower than that.

The price of Bitcoin on Bitfinex continues to be more than USD 300 higher than on Coinbase and Bitstamp as of 17 October 2018, suggesting that arbitrage mechanisms are not working. This indicates that fiat functionality on Bitfinex continues to be inefficient, since if it was efficient then arbitrage traders would bring Bitfinex’s Bitcoin price down to the global market price.

Follow on Twitter: @BitcoinNewsCom

Telegram Alerts from

Want to advertise or get published on – View our Media Kit PDF here.

Image Courtesy: Pixabay

The post Bitfinex Launches Distributed Banking Solution for Fiat Deposits appeared first on

QuadrigaCX Crypto Exchange under Siege by Canadian Banks

QuadrigaCX, which is the largest crypto exchange headquartered in Canada, is under siege by Canadian banks. The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) seized USD 28 million from QuadrigaCX’s partner Costodian and the owner of QuadrigaCX, Jose Reyes, back in January 2018. This is a big sum of money for QuadrigaCX, since although it is the biggest crypto exchange in Canada, it processes less than USD 1 million in trading volume per day.

The CIBC filed a case with the Ontario Supreme Court of Justice, asking the court to take control of the funds, and for the court to decide if the funds belong to QuadrigaCX, Costodian, or the 388 customers which initially deposited the funds. QuadrigaCX is asking the court to unfreeze the funds, since it already credited customer’s accounts with Quadriga Bucks. It is unclear if the exchange will end up being insolvent if it can’t recover the money but at this time, it is still up and running – about ten months since funds were seized.

The reason for the seizure of the USD 28 million is unknown but highlights the continued friction between the crypto space and the banking system. The fund seizure occurred when Bitcoin was declining rapidly after hitting an all-time record of USD 20,000. Possible reasons stretch from money laundering to terrorism or Bitcoin being too risky for investors because of price swings. QuadrigaCX asserts that the CIBC is trying to find a reason to justify the seizure of the funds, and didn’t have any good reason for doing it. Further, it asserts the CBIC is part of a Canadian banking cartel that is trying to stifle Bitcoin, including the Royal Bank of Canada, the Bank of Montreal, and the Bank of Nova Scotia.

The freezing of bank accounts and seizure of funds is common in the crypto space. Although QuadrigaCX talks of a Canadian banking cartel, similar situations happen in the United States too. Banks can freeze, seize, and close accounts for any reason and don’t have to disclose the reason, although the law does say that money eventually has to be returned unless its associated with illegal activity.


Follow on Twitter: @bitcoinnewscom

Telegram Alerts from

Want to advertise or get published on – View our Media Kit PDF here.

Image Courtesy: Pixabay

The post QuadrigaCX Crypto Exchange under Siege by Canadian Banks appeared first on

50cycles Banking Debacle Reveals Attitude of Banks Towards Bitcoin Trading

The owner of 50cycles, Scott Snaith is experiencing a banking nightmare after performing some relatively small peer to peer trades on Localbitcoins. Localbitcoins is the most popular peer to peer Bitcoin trading site in the world, where individuals can contact each other and exchange Bitcoin for every fiat payment method imaginable while using an escrow system that ensures minimum scamming. However, Scott Snaith did some deals in excess of USD 10,000, as little as 2 bitcoins, and his bank accounts with Barclays and HSBC were frozen. He received cash in his personal bank accounts in exchange for Bitcoin, but then those personal accounts and a connected business account were frozen.

Scott Snaith says “My two personal bank accounts and business account were frozen for using a well known Bitcoin trading site. No unlawful activity has taken place but just because the word ‘Bitcoin’ was mentioned my accounts were locked